[erik.hjalmar.josefsson@gmail.com: Re: [iindep-hub] 1049 Street]
----- Forwarded message from Erik Josefsson <erik.hjalmar.josefsson@gmail.com> ----- Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 16:14:13 +0200 From: Erik Josefsson <erik.hjalmar.josefsson@gmail.com> To: Ante Wessels <ante@ffii.org> Subject: Re: [iindep-hub] 1049 Street User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130413 Icedove/17.0.5 Thank you! Please tell <listan@lists.dfri.se> :-) On 05/07/2013 03:46 PM, Ante Wessels wrote:
Great work!
Last year I filed a complaint against the Parliament for lying about the existence of documents.
The Parliament fails to register documents properly. This way it is not known what is known by the Parliament.
keep it up!
Ante
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:59:47AM +0200, Erik Josefsson wrote:
For all of you ACTA fans out there, here's DFRI's mini series on 1049 Street:
dfri <https://www.dfri.se/wiki/>/ ep-acta-docs ------------------------------------------------------------------------
* DFRI request to EP (2013-02-26) <https://www.dfri.se/wiki/ep-acta-docs/mail-acta-docs-schulz.txt> * EP response (2013-03-26) <https://www.dfri.se/wiki/ep-acta-docs/email-response-2013-03-26.txt> o Question asked to the Court <https://www.dfri.se/wiki/ep-acta-docs/Request_for_an_opinion_A1-12.pdf> o Written observations by Parliament <https://www.dfri.se/wiki/ep-acta-docs/EP_written_observations.pdf> o Letter of 20 December 2012 <https://www.dfri.se/wiki/ep-acta-docs/letter_20-12-2012.pdf> * DFRI followup request to EP (2013-04-09) <https://www.dfri.se/wiki/ep-acta-docs/mail-acta-docs-schulz-2.txt> * EP response (2013-04-15) <https://www.dfri.se/wiki/ep-acta-docs/EP-response-2013-04-15.txt> * DFRI second followup request to EP (2013-04-21) <https://www.dfri.se/wiki/ep-acta-docs/mail-acta-docs-schulz-3.txt> * DFRI request to EC (2013-04-22) <https://www.dfri.se/wiki/ep-acta-docs/mail-acta-docs-barroso.txt> * EP response (2013-04-25) <https://www.dfri.se/wiki/ep-acta-docs/EP-response-2013-04-25.txt> * EC response (2013-05-03) <https://www.dfri.se/wiki/ep-acta-docs/EC-response-2013-05-03.txt> * DFRI thanks EP (2013-05-06) <https://www.dfri.se/wiki/ep-acta-docs/mail-acta-docs-schulz-4.txt>
In the next episode, will we see the Commission find out that it actually sent this doc to Moreira? Or will the Commission realise that the doc was not a Question from the Court, but a Decision?
Best regards.
//Erik ___________________________________________________________________________ iindep info hub - hub@iindep.org - https://listes.globenet.org/listinfo/hub policy: * do NOT forward mails or non-public information from this list * new subscribers must be approved by a list member * messages from non-members addresses are bounced back list admin is Nil (mailto:hub-owner@iindep.org, he rarely reads the list)
----- End forwarded message -----
participants (1)
-
Ante Wessels