Listan

listan@lists.dfri.se

1 participants
807 discussions

Nytt sätt att spåra medborgarna?
by Peter Michanek 10 Apr '15

10 Apr '15

http://www.dagensjuridik.se/2015/04/ny-statlig-e-legitimation-far-kritik-in… Peter. -- DFRI-listan är öppen för alla. Listan arkiveras och publiceras öppet på internet. Arkiv: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.dfri Listpolicy: https://www.dfri.se/regler-for-listan

1 0

Från UR
by JOSEFSSON Erik 08 Apr '15

08 Apr '15

Gick på TV igår: 16.15-19.00: Demokrati i en digital era. * 16.15: Så används big data. * 17.00: Demokratifrågor på nätet. * 17.25: Att skydda det privata. * 18.10: Risker med big data. http://www.kunskapskanalen.se/tabla/SVTK/2015-04-06/ Nån som har tillgång till SVTs arkiv? Skulle kunna tänka mig att skriva lite på hemsidan om det gick att se om programmen och länka till videosarna. mvh //Erik

2 2

Annual IViR Summer Course on Privacy Law and Policy, 7-11 July, Amsterdam
by Mattias 04 Apr '15

04 Apr '15

Hej DFRI, Hoppas detta inte delats tidigare, registrering är öppen till sommarkurs i Amsterdam om Privacy Law & Policy. Läs mer på http://www.ivir.nl/courses/plp/plp.html och nedanför! :) Glad påsk! Mattias -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [MyData & Open Data] Annual IViR Summer Course on Privacy Law and Policy, 7-11 July, Amsterdam Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:43:43 +0000 From: Sally Deffor <sally.deffor(a)okfn.org> To: mydata-open-data(a)lists.okfn.org Thought this might be of interest to some people on this list. Sally Dear Colleagues: The University of Amsterdam’s Institute for Information Law will be holding its second annual Summer Course on Privacy Law and Policy from July 7-11, 2014. The course will focus on privacy law and policy related to the Internet, electronic communications and ***online and social media***. A faculty of leading experts from the EU and the US will explore the recent developments and broader trends in this rapidly changing field, and will explain how businesses, governments and others can achieve their goals within it. Jacob Kohnstamm, chairman of the Dutch Data Protection Authority, will provide a keynote address. The course is aimed at private sector lawyers, government officials, NGO staff, academics, PhD students and others who work in the areas of privacy and data protection law. The course will be held in a historic canal house and will employ a seminar format that allows a deeper examination of the subject than is possible at most professional conferences. Enrollment is limited to 25 participants. Additional information—including a list of faculty members, the course programme and a link for online registration—is available at http://www.ivir.nl/courses/plp/plp.html. For questions, contact course organizer Kristina Irion (informationlaw(a)uva.nl <mailto:informationlaw@uva.nl>). Course location: De Rode Hoed <http://www.rodehoed.nl/nl/Over_de_Rode_Hoed/Over_de_Rode_Hoed/>, Keizersgracht 102, Amsterdam Please distribute this information widely in your professional networks and to share it with anyone who may be interested. Thank you, Dennis & Kristina Dennis D. Hirsch Dr. Kristina Irion Geraldine W. Howell Professor of Law Marie Curie Fellow Capital University Law School, USA Institute for Information Law, dhirsch(a)law.capital.edu <mailto:dhirsch@law.capital.edu> University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Law, NL K.Irion(a)uva.nl <mailto:K.Irion@uva.nl> -- *Sally Deffor Open Data & Privacy Project Coordinator | skype:deffor.selase | @SDeffor | +44 (0)7774 734206 The **Open Knowledge Foundation* <http://okfn.org/> */Empowering through Open Knowledge/ **http://www.okfn.org* <http://www.okfn.org/>*| **@okfn* <https://twitter.com/OKFN>*| **OKF on Facebook* <http://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork>*| **Blog* <http://blog.okfn.org/>*| **Newsletter* <http://okfn.org/?s=Newsletter>**

1 0

Tele2 kommenterar datalagringsbetänkande till regeringen
by Peter Michanek 30 Mar '15

30 Mar '15

Tele2 kommenterar datalagringsbetänkande till regeringen http://om.tele2.se/tele2-kommenterar-datalagringsbetakande-till-regeringen/ Peter. -- DFRI-listan Ã¤r Ã¶ppen fÃ¶r alla. Listan arkiveras och publiceras Ã¶ppet pÃ¥ internet. Arkiv: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.dfri Listpolicy: https://www.dfri.se/regler-for-listan

1 0

Datalagring
by Sus Andersson 30 Mar '15

30 Mar '15

Sten Heckscher klar med nya utredningen : http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/19838/a/256624 Har inte hunnit kolla vad det står . Sus Andersson sus.andersson(a)farad.se 070-953 0166

3 4

Extra nominering till styrelsen
by Erik Josefsson 27 Mar '15

27 Mar '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jag nominerar Erika https://twitter.com/EAXBreakPARTY till styrelsen. Orsaken är att jag tycker att personer i valberedningen inte ska nominera sig själva. mvh //Erik -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVFYfiAAoJEEQJK+0DIPSkx4AH/2zEhb/9oRrBm70+0ZEJ8b1A Y4NQ9F5queCnjU/aC+0D2ByB7nKXTEysuOARdFY25SdTdscbHgCR/6WFS+3iHM+Q xJw1TRupPIFq6rpfqNXpCV8vYjxSib3L41i2Wky7yOPJhtjibOgcRrz4Ymj6sOle h8pgpRUCc8t3zR5w3qEwxA28VMJWXLWea7ep2l6pbvv4GRbA0rR/bwyD8TxVTEcz yebINemdRUZEp5BAhq5KDTYw8ozRXLUkmZtDk+oAUsHCC7QijnSVFIeRquqFNaXX H97m9MaHuU2PJQRPyLZvVc7PeFiw/0d8lqtfkQreOEYUzr7AxeczyRsjskRRjm0= =9/0Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- DFRI-listan är öppen för alla. Listan arkiveras och publiceras öppet på internet. Arkiv: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.dfri Listpolicy: https://www.dfri.se/regler-for-listan

1 0

Wireframes på ny design för dfri.se
by Alexander Woll 25 Mar '15

25 Mar '15

Hej Listan :) Jag, Joel och Anders J-U satt igår kväll och diskuterade runt den nya designen för dfri.se Läs mer om det och se wireframes i posten på https://www.dfri.se/?p=2417 /Woll -- DFRI-listan är öppen för alla. Listan arkiveras och publiceras öppet på internet. Arkiv: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.dfri Listpolicy: https://www.dfri.se/regler-for-listan

1 0

Re: [DFRI-intern] Motioner inför DFRI:s Årsmöte 29/3-2015
by Joel Purra 25 Mar '15

25 Mar '15

2015-03-15 23:08 GMT+01:00 Alexander Rydekull <rydekull(a)gmail.com>: > För er som vill förbereda er inför årsmötet så finns alla inkommna > motioner publicerade i sin helhet här: > > https://www.dfri.se/dfri/motesprotokoll/2015-2/arsmote-dfri-2015/ > > Vi ser fram emot att träffa er alla på årsmötet det blir som vanligt årets > DFRI-höjdpunkt där man får träffa flest DFRI:are på en och samma plats! > Uppdatering: mötet hålls nu på *söndag 2015-03-29 klockan 13:00* hos Ipnett [0] på Dalvägen 8 i Solna [1]. Det är inget krav, men maila gärna anmälan till dfri(a)dfri.se så vi kan ordna fika till alla. Förresten, kom ihåg att betala medlemsavgiften [2] för att säkra din rösträtt! Välkomna! -joelpurra.com [0] http://www.ipnett.se/ [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1539235854 [2] https://www.dfri.se/bli-medlem/

1 0

Dataintrång: Umeå kommun vs 17-åring
by Martin Millnert 24 Mar '15

24 Mar '15

Hej, en 17-åring har stämts av Umeå kommun för dataintrång. http://www.vk.se/plus/1408023/17-aring-kravs-pa-halv-miljon-i-skadestand?pa… TL;DR: En 17-åring hittade stora säkerhetsbrister i Umeå kommuns skol-IT-miljö, bl.a. att användarnamn och lösenord låg sparat på alla klientmaskiner, åtkomligt för vem som helst. Efter att ha ha påtalat detta för kommunen utan någon som helst reaktion, gjorde 17-åringen en proof-of-concept med sårbarheten; loggade in och överlastade några servrar i 10 minuter. Som tack för det hela stämmer Umeå kommun 17-åringen för alla kostnader relaterade till ärendet, inklusive kostnader att ta fram bevismaterial till polisen. Cirka 500 000 kr för att bl.a. byta lösenord för ~600 användare. Det jag undrar är om offentlighetssverige verkligen vill gå denna vägen i extremt klara fall av whitehats som detta? Det verkar ju i såfall enbart i dessa två riktningar: * Det verkar till fördröjd upptäckt av felaktigheter, * Det verkar också mot "rapportering inom korrekta kanaler", och för rapportering via whistleblower-liknanade kanaler, d.v.s. anonymt och till stor publik. Och till sist -- är det rimligt att användare skall hållas kostnadsansvariga för IT-systemägarens kompetensbrister? DFRI kanske kunde göra ett uttalande som 17-åringen kan använda i rättegången? Vänligen, Martin

8 10

Turkish Government Approves "Censorship Bill 3.0"
by Gurkan Ozturan 23 Mar '15

23 Mar '15

*Censorship *Internet Regulations *Media Freedom *Free Speech http://revolution-news.com/turkish-government-approves-censorship-bill-3-0/ Turkish government has tried repeatedly over the course of years, to pass restrictive bills that suggest draconian measures to interrupt free flow of information on the internet, thus legalize censorship. Year after year a new bill has been drafted and brought to parliament floor, dozens of thousands protested each time, opposition parties united in standing against government’s censorship attempts, bill would pass and president would sign it off immediately, enabling the effectiveness of the bill. Eventually persistent protests would Show results and opposition parties would apply to the supreme court and court decisions would cancel the bills. The past few weeks in Turkey’s political agenda has been of a very different nature than what even the Turkish citizens have been used to. First there came the homeland security bill, then passed the prison security bill and now finally we have the internet security bill once again. All these crucial bills have come almost simultaneously. Due to fast-approaching national elections in early June, members of parliament from the opposition parties have already started campaigning and participating in premieres, thus unable to form proper opposition in the parliament. Then again, what good is it when the governing AKP holds close to 2/3 majority in the house with less than half of the votes in the elections. Even though there has been taken some measures by the opposition to use all legislative methods and means to block the debate on the bill, thus postponing the vote, government has not allowed the debate to take place and directly passed the bills. The internet bill “censorship 3.0” has come all of a sudden when the nation was discussing elections, Kurdish peace process, homeland security bill, prison bill, upcoming centennial of Armenian Genocide Commemoration, etc. The opposition deputies declare the internet bill as a precaution that the government has brought up in order to have “quiet” during the election period, and not allow any protests or opposition rallies en-masse. Previously, every time the internet bill had failed, the new draft had become even harsher, bringing further mechanisms and tools of censorship into play. The new bill openly states the methods of full government control and bypassing of courts, rules and regulations, violating citizens basic rights and liberties. Supreme court had already cancelled the bill previously when it was less obvious than the new bill, and how the court members will behave now will determine the direction of free speech in Turkey. The government on the other hand uses the same excuses to legitimize the will to censor critical voices: “what will happen if children become victims of online harassment, or what will happen if someone insults the ‘untouchable’ figures, and if someone’s basic rights get violated online?” Thus the government suggests that a bill is necessary to directly block access to a website without a court order or further evaluation for up to 48 hours, which will then be followed by access-blocking with the court order. The bill does not specifically mention how long a site will be closed down as it is not stated in the bill. Member of the parliament from the governing AK Party, Özel has stated that free flow of information may sound nice but politicians and citizens should not be naive to expect unregulated freedom, as unreal propaganda also has tendency to spread very quickly if there is no such control mechanism. Özel also went ahead to defend the bill saying “this bill does not turn our President or Prime Minister into a judge or prosecutor, it merely allows them with authority to shut down access to harmful content; in the aftermath of the incident we would still g oto courts to get warrant to block access. And, the supreme court this time will not cancel the bill.” The renewed internet bill suggests: “Updating the Bill on Regulating the Publications on Internet and Combating Cyber Crime, the foreseen changes will enable Prime Ministerial or any ministerial office to request blocking access to or removal of content from certain websites which violate the laws, without the necessity of a court order. The request will be made to TIB (Telecommunications Directorate) and decision to block access will have to be applied in the four hours following request. The 24 hours following the decision will be open for a judge approval, if the decision to cancel is not applied within 48 hours, it will be automatically lifted. If simply blocking a page or certain content does not stop the circulation of the harmful content, then the whole website/root-supplier will be blocked. Those who have created the harmful content will be subject to investigation and all personal information will be supplied by ISPs including the address of the person. Those ISPs or supporters of the harmful content creators, who do not cooperate with the state officials will be subjected to fines covering 3.000 days to 10.000 days. The ISPs that do not fully comply with the TIB requests and court decisions will receive heavy penalties in fines. This law is necessary to have and be applied even without a court order in case there is a matter of national security and public order, or for prevention of other crimes.” Currently there is "estimated" over 100.000 websites that are blocked in Turkey. Citizens are heavily surveilled-on and mass surveillance systems also are being used in profiling citizens based on their ethnicity, language, religion, sexual orientation, political views, consumption habits etc. Internet platform remains as the only partly-free atmospheres in Turkey for opposition groups and in the past few years critical citizens and groups have made serious gains mostly thanks to engagement over social media. Before the coming national elections, governing AKP is polled roughly around 40% and if the results come as expected they will not be able to form a single-party government as the past 13 years. These next few weeks might be the last chance to pass heavily restrictive laws that will have more intervention to citizens private lives. Moreover, the new bill might also be attempting to prevent a next round of "Charlie Hebdo Crisis", preventing Turkish newspapers to republish the caricatures online. http://revolution-news.com/turkish-government-approves-censorship-bill-3-0/ Gurkan Ozturan http://TheRadicalDemocrat.wordpress.com gsm: (009)0542 741 55 63 twitter.com/Obefintlig <http://twitter.com/GurkanOzturan>

1 0

← Newer
1
...
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
...
81
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

Listan