The joint AFET/DEVE meeting shortlisted the following three nominees for
the 2013 Sakharov Prize:
- Ales Bialatski, Eduard Lobau and Mykola Statkevich on behalf of
all Belarusian political prisoners
- Edward Snowden
- Malala Yousafzai
A vote for the shortlist of three finalists will be held in the three
Committees on 30 September 2013. The Conference of Presidents will
announce the winner/s of the 2013 Sakharov Prize on 10 October 2013.
//Erik
Några åsikter om den här browsern?
"Using Chromium, an open source browser project that provides the underpinnings for Google’s Chrome, the Epic browser features protections meant to keep out snooping governments, as well as private companies looking to make a buck off your data. And, unlike some of the more complex privacy tools that already exist, part of Epic’s express mission (so its developers say) is to make privacy accessible for plebeians."
http://www.fastcoexist.com/3018133/a-browser-to-keep-the-nsa-from-snooping-…
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hej!
Jag har nu skickat ut mail till EU-parlamentariker om att Snowden
borde få Sakharovpriset :) On the twittermachines now!
mvh
Emil
engelskt mail:
Best MEPs,
In 1968, the soviet dissident and physicist Andrei Sakharov[1] shared
details about the soviet hydrogen bomb project and the dangers the
project implied for humanity to the public. His acts were not only
awarded with the Nobel Peace Prize, but your precessors in the
European Parliament decided to constitute a prize for the freedom of
thought in his honor[2].
This year one man have distinguished in the very way of the Sakharov
prize by choosing to share details about the USA:s systematic abuse of
their imperial powers to massurvey citizens of the world. The
whistleblower Edward Snowden shared information that has put his very
freedom to the edge, choosing between a conditional freedom in Putin's
Russia or a certain life in prison in the USA. He has, in many ways,
become a dissident just like Sakharov were before him.
Even though many people walking on this earth have done theirs to
ensure our freedom of though is being preserved, Edward Snowden is one
of our times most important whistleblower who selfishlessly stood up
for fundamental human rights by blowing the whistle on the NSA PRISM.
The swedish organization for digital freedoms and rights :DFRI would
encourage you to vote for Snowden for the short-list for the
Sakharov-prize on this monday[3][4] in order to honor his contribution
to aid fundamental human rights and basic democratic principles.
Thank you!
svensk version:
Hej EU-parlamentariker!
1968 avslöjade sovjetdissidenten Andrei Sakharov[1] detaljer om
Sovjets vätebombsprogram och hotet det innebar för mänskligheten, en
handling som, tillsammans med hans kommande engagemang för mänskliga
rättigheter innebar att Sakharov inte bara belönades med Nobels
fredspris, utan också inspirerade era föregångare i parlamentet att
instifta ett pris för att hedra den fria tanken[2].
I år har en person mer än någon annan blivit en symbol för att USA
under flera år har systematiskt valt att massövervaka och
åsiktsregistrerat världsmedborgare - NSA-whistleblowern Edward Snowden
har under sommaren avslöjat detaljer om massövervakning som inte bara
har varit bevis på stort mod, utan också i Sakharov-anda, gjort honom
till något som kan liknas till dissident.
Det är många som förtjänar att få Sakharovpriset för den fria tanken,
men Edward Snowdens uppoffring av sin egen trygghet för att osjälviskt
dela med sig av hur en av vår tids viktigaste regimer har visat brist
på respekt för människors grundläggande rättigheter.
Vi i :DFRI ber dig därför nu på måndag, 30 september, se till att
placera Edward Snowden på listan för kandidater till Sakharovprisets
kortlista[3] för att hedra hans insats för mänskliga fri- och
rättigheter och för demokratins bevarande, inte bara i USA utan även i
EU och övriga delar av världen.
Tack!
[1]:
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1975/sakharov-bio.ht…
[2]:
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/aboutparliament/en/00f3dd2249/Sakharov-Prize-…
[3]: http://mjuk.is/sakharov.pdf
[4]: http://www.article19.org/join-the-debate.php/111/view/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=Wvqe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
DFRI-listan är öppen för alla.
Listan arkiveras och publiceras öppet på internet.
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.dfri
Här är länken: http://www.article19.org/join-the-debate.php/111/view/
//Erik
From Sakharov to Snowden: Why Edward Snowden should receive the 2013
Sakharov Prize
BarboraBukovska
26 Sep 2013
<http://www.article19.org/join-the-debate.php/111/view/#debateComments>
*Next week (30 September) members of the European Parliament will decide
who will be awarded the Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought
<http://www.europarl.europa.eu/aboutparliament/en/00f3dd2249/Sakharov-Prize-…>.
The winner will be chosen by members of three committees (AFET, DEVE and
DROI) and announced by Conference of Presidents on 10 October 2013. The
Prize has honoured the efforts of individuals and organisations who
defend human rights and freedom of expression annually since 1988. *
*Edward Snowden, the former US National Security Agency (NSA) contractor
and whistleblower, is among the nominees for the Prize. *
While all of this year's nominees are deserving of global recognition
for their admirable and courageous action to highlight and defend human
rights, it is Snowden's exposure of a massive and unaccountable state
sponsored surveillance programme that most closely captures the enduring
legacy of the man that the prize is named after. The 1975 Nobel Peace
Prize winner Andrei Sakharov.
Sakharov was a Russian physicist who rejected the USSR's nuclear
programme; he shunned his own work in a secret research laboratory to
become an outspoken opponent and critic of the oppressive reach of the
Kremlin. Even in exile, Sakharov continued to raise his voice,
denouncing social injustice and advocating the benefits of democracy.
It is fair to say that Sakharov was a security state insider, working on
the powerful weapons that could affect all humanity. Snowden too was a
security state insider, working on powerful weapons enabling the
interception of the electronic communications. Through his revelations,
Snowden voiced objection to the vast scale of secret state surveillance
of millions of people around the world, including foreign presidents
<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/03/world/americas/brazil-angered-over-report…>
and companies
<http://g1.globo.com/fantastico/noticia/2013/09/petrobras-foi-espionada-pelo…>.
The revelations revealed how democratically elected U.S. senators
<http://www.latimes.com/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-clapper-snowden-disclosures-…>
had lied. These revelations have released information that is on of
strong public concern, including previously classified judgments from
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court articulating alarm about
governmental conduct
<http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/785205-pub-march-2-2009-order-from-f…>.
Over thirty years on from Sakharov's exile, Snowden's actions reflect
that he is the true inheritor of the Sakharov legacy. Like Sakharov,
Snowden decided to defect and stand for the values of society at large
against the secretive interests of state machinery. Like Sakharov,
Snowden finds himself an outcast, living in asylum and hounded as a result.
In divulging classified information, Snowden has greatly jeopardised
both his professional and personal livelihood. Beyond displaying great
courage, Snowden instigated and much needed and long overdue discussion
and debate about the preservation of democratic ideals and the limits of
permissible government interference with human rights in a world where
national security has been used increasingly to justify the erosion of
fundamental freedoms.
Snowden's action has showed that blanket mass-surveillance practices are
not limited to 'communist states' and 'dictators.'
Many members of the European Parliament who grew up within a communist
state will surely remember the effect such surveillance -- the purpose
of which was nothing more than to control behaviour and dictate the
conduct of everyday life. One study of the EU Data Retention Directive
poignantly observed that "under pervasive surveillance, individuals are
inclined to make choices that conform to mainstream expectations."
The Members of the European Parliament must make sure that human rights
violations exposed by Snowden are addressed; surveillance must be
constrained to cases when justified under international law. They also
must make sure that governments remain accountable and transparent in an
age where unprecedented technological advances allow for increased
ability for subterfuge.
By the same token, Members of the European Parliament should also
recognise the individual who has exposed these violations; a man who has
fought for human rights protection and for the traditions and liberties
that the Prize embodies.
*Edward Snowden must be the recipient of the 2013 Sakharov Prize.*
Sagan fortsätter!
/andreas
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FW: Renewed request for one ACTA document --- Ref. Gestdem
2013/4775
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:34:48 +0000
From: <Sg-Acc-Doc(a)ec.europa.eu>
To: <andreas(a)romab.com>
Dear Sir,
Thank you for your email dated 15/09/2013.
We hereby acknowledge receipt of your application for access to
documents, which was registered on 25/09/2013 under reference number
GestDem 2013/4775.
In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 regarding public access
to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, your
application will be handled within 15 working days.
The time limit will expire on 16/10/2013. In case this time limit needs
to be extended, you will be informed in due course.
Yours faithfully,
Carlos Remis
SG.B.5.
Transparence.
Berl. 05/329.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Jonsson [mailto:andreas@romab.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 10:23 PM
To: BARROSO Jose Manuel (CAB-BARROSO)
Cc: DFRI-listan
Subject: Renewed request for one ACTA document
Dear President Barroso,
In the light of Case C-506/08 P (p. 81-82)[0], the Court's email to DFRI
14 August 2013[1] and the provisions of Regulation 1049/2001[2] which
require your staff to assist us on how applications for access to
documents can be made (6.4), to clarify our application would it not be
sufficiently precise (6.2), and to exercise our rights (1.14) we hereby
ask you to make the document we have been asking for[3] available to the
public and send it to us without further delay, if necessary by asking
the Court for permission to do so.
Would you be of the opinion that you are prohibited from asking the
Court for permission, please state your reasons in detail.
Please note that the provisions of Regulation 1049/2001 referred to
above does not exclude that citizens are informed about that the
President of the Commission may ask the Court to make documents public
which do not fall within the scope of Regulation 1049/2001.
Please also note that your staff has referred extensively to the content
of this document in a press conference almost one year ago[4] and that
your staff has described the content of the document in detail in the
email DFRI received 19 June 2013 [5].
With best regards,
Andreas Jonsson
DFRI - Föreningen för digitala fri och rättigheter
https://dfri.se/index.en
[0]
http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=107935&pageI…
[1] https://www.dfri.se/wiki/ep-acta-docs/ECJ-response-2013-08-14.txt
[2] http://www.europarl.europa.eu/register/pdf/r1049_en.pdf
[3] https://www.dfri.se/wiki/ep-acta-docs/mail-acta-docs-barroso.txt
[4] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCBTFh3IhQY
[5] https://www.dfri.se/wiki/ep-acta-docs/EC-response-2013-06-19.txt
--
DFRI-listan är öppen för alla.
Listan arkiveras och publiceras öppet på internet.
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.dfri
Nu behöver jag hjälp igen!
@Erik Lönroth, kan du be att få ut den här studien? (skriv, som vanligt,
med listan i cc)
"The IT department has, fourth, analysed two competing document
standards, Open Document Format and Office OpenXML, assisting the
Groupe de Travail de Bureautique Interinstitutionnel (EU working
group on interinstitutional office tools). "*This study* testifies
to the difficulty of choosing one of these formats even though both
are ISO standardised and to the importance of requirements, the
existing documentary heritage and the systems in place when it comes
to making a decision."
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/osor/news/european-parliament-it-foll…
@Alexander Rydekull, kan du skriva nåt om att AT4AM inte funkar (eller
att det funkar) att köra på på en fristående server (samma artikel)?
"The XML format is used in the EP's AT4AM, software for authoring
and management of amendments on parliamentary texts. AT4AM was
released as open source earlier this year."
Ha en underbar DFRI dag! :-)
//Erik
Hej listan!
Jag är inte jurist och jag har inte läst alla de 439 sidorna men... det
här kan inte vara i medborgarnas intresse och nytta menar jag:
27 kap.
16 §
Den som i elektronisk form innehar en viss lagrad uppgift som skäligen
kan antas ha betydelse för utredningen
om ett brott får föreläggas att bevara
uppgiften.
I föreläggandet ska anges under hur lå
ng tid uppgiften ska bevaras. Tiden
får inte bestämmas längre än nödvändigt
och får inte överstiga 90 dagar. Om
det finns särskilda skäl får tiden för be
varande förlängas med
högst 30 dagar.
Föreläggande får inte riktas mot den som skäligen kan misstänkas för brottet
eller någon honom eller henne sådan närs
tående person som avses i 36 kap.
3 §.
"Första stycket innebär att den som i elektronisk form innehar en
viss lagrad uppgift som skäligen kan antas ha betydelse för utred-
ningen om ett brott får föreläggas att bevara uppgiften. De elek-
troniska uppgifter som ett föreläggande kan avse kan vara av vilket
slag som helst."
s329
16 a §
Föreläggande enligt 16 § beslutas av
undersökningsledaren eller åklagaren.
Om det är möjligt ska föreläggandet ges skriftligt. I annat fall ska den
före-
lagde så snart som möjligt få ett
skriftligt bevis om beslutet.
Meddelande om åtgärden får inte obeh
örigen föras vidare. Föreläggandet
ska innehålla en unde
rrättelse om detta.
Den som ålagts föreläggandet får be
gära rättens prövning av förelägg-
andet. För rättens prövning gäller
i tillämpliga delar vad som sägs i 6 §
s332
Mycket text men: "De elektroniska uppgifter som ett föreläggande kan
avse kan vara av vilket slag som helst."
Tål att tänkas på tycker jag.
Sist undrar jag varför man inte anställer någon med någon som helst
teknisk kompetens i ett sådant viktigt ärende? Eller är det så det går
till alltid, infrastruktur, kärnkraft, försvar etc.?
/19x20
PS. Orkar inte ordna min klipp och klistra text från:
http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/21/81/01/a83091f6.pdf
--
DFRI-listan är öppen för alla.
Listan arkiveras och publiceras öppet på internet.
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.dfri
Hej listan!
DFRI och Sparvnästet planerar köra ett till CryptoParty, innehåll tror vi att vi enkelt med er hjälp kan fylla på med. Men vi behöver en lokal/datum för att kunna börja hårdplanera.
Så hitåt med era tips på lokaler och kontakter! Hjälp gärna till och fråga de ni känner med och meddela. Kanske arbetar ni på ett ställe där man gärna skulle vilja vara samarrangör för ett CryptoParty?
Ni kan visa det här blogginlägget som TorProject skrev om det sist ifall man vill veta mer - https://blog.torproject.org/blog/cryptoparty-stockholm
Det vore bra om lokalen tog minst 70 personer, finns det två salar vore det grymt. Det är dock inget krav. Förutom detta måste vi ha nät och kunna presentera saker (projektor).
Gärna en av lördagarna 26 okt, 2 nov, 9 nov eller 16 nov - men vi är öppna för alla förslag!
//Linda, DFRI