Listan

listan@lists.dfri.se

1 participants
807 discussions

Bakom Skärmen – Över Gränsen
by Linus Nordberg 02 Sep '14

02 Sep '14

Hej! Tips. Händer på söndag i Stockholm: http://gransen.nu/ -- DFRI-listan är öppen för alla. Listan arkiveras och publiceras öppet på internet. Arkiv: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.dfri Listpolicy: https://www.dfri.se/regler-for-listan

1 0

Senaste mötesprotokollet på webben
by Hanna Larsson 21 Aug '14

21 Aug '14

Nu är protokollet från senaste styrelsemötet publicerat på DFRI-webben: https://www.dfri.se/dfri/motesprotokoll/2014-2/6-20140818/ Hälsningar Hanna Larsson, Ordförande -- DFRI-listan Ã¤r Ã¶ppen fÃ¶r alla. Listan arkiveras och publiceras Ã¶ppet pÃ¥ internet. Arkiv: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.dfri Listpolicy: https://www.dfri.se/regler-for-listan

1 0

"Undervakning" eller omvänd övervakning i SR P1 Studio Ett
by Joel Purra 11 Aug '14

11 Aug '14

God kväll, "Undervakning" eller omvänd övervakning, av Emiliano Strauss http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=1637&artikel=5934692 De nämner @RiksdagWikiEdit och Creeper. Den senare utvecklades av Patrik Wallström, styrelsemedlem i DFRI. https://twitter.com/RiksdagWikiEdit http://creeper.se/ Finns det fler svenska exempel? -joelpurra.com

1 0

Nästa styrelsemöte 18/8
by Hanna Larsson 06 Aug '14

06 Aug '14

Hejsan, Nästa styrelsemöte för DFRI kommer att vara på måndag 18/8, klockan 18.30. Styrelsemötena är öppna för medlemmar och du anmäler ditt intresse för att gå genom att maila dfri(a)dfri.se Agendan kommer snart, men om du har frågor du vill ta upp kan du maila dem till oss redan nu på samma adress. Lokal är inte bestämd än, men det blir någonstans centralt i Stockholm. Alla som föranmäler sig får mer information innan mötet :) Hälsningar Hanna Larsson, Ordförande -- DFRI-listan Ã¤r Ã¶ppen fÃ¶r alla. Listan arkiveras och publiceras Ã¶ppet pÃ¥ internet. Arkiv: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.dfri Listpolicy: https://www.dfri.se/regler-for-listan

1 0

"Data Retention after the Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union"
by Erik Josefsson 24 Jul '14

24 Jul '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 109 packade sidor med extra allt. "This study analyses the Data Retention Directive Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 8 April 2014 and evaluates its impact on other data retention measures at Member States as well as at EU level." http://www.greens-efa.eu/data-retention-12640.html //Erik -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT0WYQAAoJEEQJK+0DIPSkeK8IAK8x8tGIsfnZNKfThzUm2YUG rZzD+N2L+ke8P9X2ew3AzOKupF1j2w08xiEYrPK6HMyH1v7Zfmti74d+S3tX3N53 joQwro2/3bJEjyYfcEkqypR3zPxLjA+kD6MpNsqUlzQbA6U7STkKgm0Jmru5/ziG qVY128V7YqX9/MOCNXFgpRjkMWWfRMJPcL8mtYs+ZrZNr6ultVSHOiIWrk4AwCYA cXxUn/Us//dECg7t935z/k1zV0O0dKYog9tWjIyFjG4itb+4vKLgw4oNPdf3bNwO V36l4EyqHIV149jhaAYGoiTRsvE7z7A36xvKn6lJpO1vjc1dRE8vlvTVDeXPZrI= =KoHq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- DFRI-listan Ã¤r Ã¶ppen fÃ¶r alla. Listan arkiveras och publiceras Ã¶ppet pÃ¥ internet. Arkiv: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.dfri Listpolicy: https://www.dfri.se/regler-for-listan

1 0

Fwd: [cp-global] Infosec 4 journalists (and other humans)
by Patrik Wallstrom 14 Jul '14

14 Jul '14

Den här skriften borde intressera folk här på listan, en brittisk handbok i informationssäkerhet riktad mot journalister: http://www.tcij.org/resources/handbooks/infosec Begin forwarded message: > From: Arjen Kamphuis <arjen(a)gendo.ch> > Subject: [cp-global] Infosec 4 journalists (and other humans) > Date: 14 Jul 2014 10:16:46 GMT+2 > To: general(a)hackerspaces.nl, privacycafe(a)privacycafe.nl, "noisysquare(a)noisysquare.com" <noisysquare(a)noisysquare.com>, global(a)cryptoparty.is > > Dear fellow hacktivists, > > For the UK Centre for Investigate Journalism I have co-authored a > handbook 'Information Security for Journalists'. This is a book in a > series of handbooks commissioned by the CIJ with the aim to produce > densly packed knowledge for investigative journalists who operate at the > sharp end of the profession (either operating in scary countries or > against scary opponents). It is however also very usable for other > humans who just want to back up their UNDHR article 12 rights with some > strong crypto. > > Most of the credit for the writing goes to my co-author Silkie Carlo who > works with intelligence whistleblowers for a living. All technical > mistakes are mine. > > Last week we published an initial version of the handbook during the > CIJ's yearly Summerschool Conference: > http://www.tcij.org/resources/handbooks/infosec > This book is intented as a practical crashcourse that any interested, > non-IT-specialist individual can run through in a long weekend (or two). > We are currently processing feedback from journalists who have been > trying it out and putting resources in place to do maintenance and > translations into a dozen+ languages (including Arabic, Russian and > Chinese). > > Interview with RT's Max Keiser: > http://www.gendo.nl/en/blog/arjen/bankrupting-the-nsa-with-tails-defeating-… > > Feedback most welcome! (feedback mail in book and on the above page). > > The entire book is Creative Commons licenced (BY-NC-SA) and so will all > future versions be, including the translations. We're working on ebook > formats and will make dead-tree versions after the summer when we've > worked in two months of feedback. > > To the best of my knowledge there was nothing like this available up to > now. If I'm wrong please point me to other materials I may have missed. > Thanks! > > > -- > Met vriendelijke groet/With kind regards/Mit Freundlige Grußen, > Arjen Kamphuis > Gendo B.V. > > Main: +31 20 891 0330 > mail: arjen(a)gendo.ch > > gendo.ch (website) > gendo.nl/blog/arjen (Dutch blog) > gendo.ch/en/blog/arjen (English blog) > > about.me/arjenkamphuis (social media) > > files.gendo.nl/keys/arjen(a)gendo.ch.asc (public key) > PGP fingerprint: > 55FB B3B7 949D ABF5 F31B BA1D 237D 4C50 118A 0EC2 > > ============================================================ > This e-mail message and its attachments are subject to the disclaimer > published at the following website of Gendo: > http://www.gendo.nl/disclaimer Gendo B.V. is registered with the trade > register in The Netherlands under number 28116864. > > _______________________________________________ > global mailing list > global(a)cryptoparty.is > https://cryptoparty.is/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/global

1 0

Re: [DFRI-listan] Öppet brev till Netclean
by Erik Josefsson 06 Jul '14

06 Jul '14

Okej, känner till monkeysphere litegrann, men det är WoT om jag fattat rätt. Samtidigt verkar Convergence vara cert-baserat, eller? Finns det ingen kombo? Och fråga två, kan man upphandla sånt här? Man kan ju upphandla IT som ska vara Fri Programvara genom att speca källkod som feature. //Erik Peter Norin <peter(a)xpd.se> wrote: >Ta och kika på DANE[1] eller Convergence[2]. > > >/P > > >1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS-based_Authentication_of_Named_Entities > >2. http://convergence.io/ > > >On 6Jul, 2014, at 17:11 , JOSEFSSON Erik <erik.josefsson(a)europarl.europa.eu> wrote: > > >Förlåt om det här är ett kraftfullt slag i luften, ,men är det inte dags att bygga infrastruktur som underlättar att fler utfärdar sina egna cert? > >Med PGP så gör man ju sitt eget nyckelpar, behövs ingen digital notarie för att jag ska lita på Andreas eller Joel. > >Om man tar ett kapitalistiskt perspektiv så borde ju t.ex. DN.SE vara intresserade av att deras annonsörer exponeras till dom som DN har lovat. YouTube som exempel gör det kanske svårare att förstå att det handlar om att veta vem man "tittar på"? Eller? > >Om du och Joel skulle säga till mig (genom nån slags WoT) att jag kan lita på att DN.SE verkligen är DN.SE så slipper ju .SE göra det, eller hur? > >Det känns helt rimligt samhällsekonomiskt att distribuerad tillit är bra för alla. > >Så varför inte investera i det då? > >//Erik > >________________________________________ >From: Andreas Jonsson [andreas(a)romab.com] >Sent: Thursday 3 July 2014 22:45 >To: listan(a)lists.dfri.se >Subject: Re: [DFRI-listan] Öppet brev till Netclean > >Hej, >Om man använder sina egna CA:s och blir påkomna kommer dessa åka ur >trust-bundlen snabbare än vi hinner blinka, detta för att den typen av >aktiviteter raserar hela trustmodellen. Mest talande är >Diginotar-fallet, som tog med sig holländska e-legitimationer i fallet. > >De kanske kommer undan en gång med att göra det, men inte fler. Detta >har dock redan hänt i fallet med turk trust, när de "råkade" utfärda >gmail.com. > >Kolla annars: >https://www.securelist.com/en/blog/208194063/TURKTRUST_CA_Problems > >/andreas > >On 2014-07-03 21:57, Per Andersson wrote: > > >2014-07-03 10:40 GMT+02:00 Joel Purra <mig(a)joelpurra.se>: > > >2014-07-02 23:04 GMT+02:00 Martin Millnert <martin(a)millnert.se>: > >Det är alltså fullt möjligt i Netcleans ögon, så länge browsers har dessa >CA:s som Turkiet kontrollerar. Hur ofta tas en CA bort från browsers? > > >Det sker väl lite då och då. T ex togs CAcert bort ur FreeBSD för ett tag sedan >och ur Ubuntu och Debian nyligen. [0] > >I Debian gick det en diskussion om att när CAcert togs bort (för att de inte >verifierar identit tillräckligt tror jag) att även andra stora CAs >borde tas bort >för de signerar vad som helst som skickar pengar. De här stora CA tas inte >bort för då blir besök på www med Debian totaldrygt för användarna som >möts av NOT TRUSTED hela tiden. Stora CA är alltså för too big to fail och >fortsätter att skeppas trots att de inte sköter sig enligt CA-policies osv. > > >Finns alternativ? Kan man tänka sig att implementera någon form av >certificate pinning[1] på bredare front? > > >Monkeysphere [1] är ett alternativ som använder OpenPGP web of trust för >att verifiera identitet. > > >[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAcert#Inclusion_status >[1] http://web.monkeysphere.info/ > > >-- >Per > > >-- >DFRI-listan är öppen för alla. >Listan arkiveras och publiceras öppet på internet. >Arkiv: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.dfri >Listpolicy: https://www.dfri.se/regler-for-listan > > >-- >DFRI-listan Ã¤r Ã¶ppen fÃ¶r alla. >Listan arkiveras och publiceras Ã¶ppet pÃ¥ internet. >Arkiv: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.dfri >Listpolicy: https://www.dfri.se/regler-for-listan > >

1 0

Öppet brev till Netclean
by Martin Millnert 06 Jul '14

06 Jul '14

Hej listan, Ikväll postades ett öppet brev till Netcleans VD på hemsidan: https://www.dfri.se/oppet-brev-till-christian-berg-vd-netclean/ Vänligen, Martin

6 6

Andreas Jonsson om Netclean på P3 nu på morgonen
by Joel Purra 04 Jul '14

04 Jul '14

God morgon, Sedan kl 06:30 i morse har P3 pushat för en intervju med DFRI:s egna Andreas Jonsson, som har arbetat hårt med artiklar och vårt öppna brev till Netclean. Programmet finns även tillgängligt i efterhand. https://sverigesradio.se/p3/ Öppet brev till Christian Berg, VD Netclean https://www.dfri.se/oppet-brev-till-christian-berg-vd-netclean/ Netclean och Turkiet (med länksamling) https://www.dfri.se/netclean-och-turkiet/ Bra jobbat Andreas! -joelpurra.com

1 1

Fwd: Answering guides for EU ISDS consultation
by Erik Josefsson 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

Långt viktigt mail från Ante. //Erik -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Answering guides for EU ISDS consultation Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:19:06 +0200 From: Ante Wessels <ante(a)FFII.ORG> Answering guides for EU ISDS consultation https://www.vrijschrift.org/serendipity/index.php?/archives/158-Answering-g… or http://bit.ly/1nBEdqX The European Digital Rights initiative (EDRi) has published an answering guide for the European Commission's consultation on investor-to-state dispute settlement (ISDS), probably the most controversial element of proposed EU trade agreements. The consultation ends the 6th of July. ISDS gives foreign investors, usually multinationals, the right to circumvent domestic courts and challenge decisions of states for international investment tribunals if decisions may lead to lower profits than expected. The cases are decided by for-profit arbitrators, they would be able to overturn decisions of supreme and human rights courts. For an introduction see Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz or Vrijschrift. EDRi's answering guide points out procedural and substantive issues with ISDS. The guide has a focus on human rights and the negative effects ISDS has on our ability to reform copyright and patent law. If you do not have a lot of time you may like to focus on questions 5, 7, 8 and 13. AK Europa (the Brussels office of the Austrian Federal Chamber of Labour), ÖGB Europabüro (the Brussels office of the Austrian Trade Union Federation), and Friends of the Earth Europe have set up an online tool, which features a template response, and allows for individual contributions to the consultation in a few clicks. Corporate Europe Observatory published "Still not loving ISDS: 10 reasons to oppose investors' super-rights in EU trade deals". Seattle to Brussels Network: Campaigners slam Commission’s mock consultation on investor rights in EU-US trade deal Trade Justice Movement: TJM says no to ISDS 11.11.11: Traité transatlantique : répondons tous à la commission ! The FFII put on line its draft submission to the consultation "ISDS: A rigged system, avoid lock-in". The draft conclusion reads: This note concludes that investor-to-state dispute settlement lacks conventional institutional safeguards for independence and has characteristics of a rigged system. The appointment of arbitrators is not neutral and gives the US an unfair advantage. The US never lost an ISDS case, we can not expect European companies to win major ISDS cases against the US, all the more as the US is not shy to exert pressure on arbitrators. We can expect that US companies will win ISDS cases against the EU and member states. This leads to four considerations. First, ISDS arbitrators will be able to review all decisions of governments, legislators and courts, including the European Court of Human Rights, and they can award unlimited damages. The European Commission aims to add ISDS to trade agreements from which it is near impossible to withdraw. Given that ISDS lacks conventional institutional safeguards for independence, does not observe the separation of powers, has characteristics of a rigged system and gives the US an unfair advantage, the transfer vast powers to arbitrators without possibility of withdrawal would be imprudent. At the very least, to protect its future, the EU has to avoid a lock-in, should not deviate from standing European practice of stand-alone investment agreements. The EU should not add ISDS to trade agreements. Second, the EU aims to create a global standard. Presently a minority of foreign investments is covered by ISDS, after ISDS agreements between the major capital exporting countries a large majority of global foreign investments would be covered by ISDS. Wide coverage of global foreign investments and impossibility to withdraw would create a near global lock-in. Given that the commission's reforms fail on many counts, a near global lock-in would give arbitrators unprecedented and unchecked powers. This would burden democracies, local companies, tax payers, human rights and the rule of law. Third, quintessentially, states need a margin of appreciation. States which are constantly battered by threats and legal challenges can not function properly, can not take decisive action. The US protect themselves through a system rigged to their advantage. It is an existential threat to the EU not to be able to take decisive action, especially since the US can. Raison d'état necessitates to avoid this situation. Fourth, foundationally, an essential aspect of liberalism is constitutional liberalism - the separation of powers, the creation of strong institutions. Sovereign decisional power accompanied by strong institutions can provide fairness. ISDS undermines the institutions. ISDS undermines the EU's vital interests and values, it has to be rejected. In doing so, the EU would give direction to the debate and create room to strengthen alternatives.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
...
81
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

Listan