Listan

listan@lists.dfri.se

803 discussions

Fwd: [sparvnastet] Prata om internetdagarna
by Emil Tullstedt 05 Sep '13

05 Sep '13

Någon som ska dit och kolla? mvh -- Emil Tullstedt ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mathias Tervo <mathias.tervo(a)gmail.com> Date: 2013/9/5 Subject: [sparvnastet] Prata om internetdagarna To: "sparvnastet(a)lists.riseup.net" <sparvnastet(a)lists.riseup.net> Hej! Ikväll klockan 18:00 tänkte några av oss samlas för att prata om internetdagarna och ifall sparvnästet skall vara med på något hörn. Vi har blivit ombedda att komma på något bra att göra. Så klockan 18:00 på resturangen Södermanna i Söderhallarna på Medborgarplatsen. Kom! Bästa hej - Mathias / vojd

1 0

Ang.: [DFRI-listan] Tvingande regel att vidarebefordra e-post
by Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder 04 Sep '13

04 Sep '13

Exakt. Och medan det för telefonnummer är relevant är det helt feltänkt för e-post. Bra om du skickar in den frågan i rätt riktning. /amel Skickat från min HTC ----- Reply message ----- Från: "Erik Josefsson" <erik.hjalmar.josefsson(a)gmail.com> Till: "listan(a)lists.dfri.se" <listan(a)lists.dfri.se> Rubrik: [DFRI-listan] Tvingande regel att vidarebefordra e-post Datum: ons, sep 4, 2013 14:23 Låter som om man kopierat tanken på att man ska kunna ha kvar sitt telefonnummer när man byter telefonbolag. Jag har flyttat runt både mitt belgiska och mitt svenska nummer en del, så just det är inte så dumt tycker jag. Men dom menar alltså att om jag har fått erik.josfesson(a)telia.com<mailto:erik.josfesson@telia.com> av Telia så ska jag inte behöva byta till erik.josfesson(a)bredbandsbolaget.se<mailto:erik.josfesson@bredbandsbolaget.se> bara för att jag byter internetleverantör? Låter spännande med den där fläkten :-) Btw, låt mig än en gång påminna om att jag kan erbjuda den finfina tjänsten "MEP-fråga". Ibland blir dom riktigt bra och då kan det hända att nån folkvald förbarmar sig och ställer den till Kommissionen, språkrör som dom ska vara för folket. Typ så här, fast kanske lite mer text: Subject: Fire in the attic? Question: What are you going to do about people with SPF[1]? [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework //Erik On 09/04/2013 01:45 PM, Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder wrote: http://www.edri.org/files/130709-SM-ISC.pdf artikel 24, sidan 42. REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL laying down measures to complete the European single market for electronic communications and to achieve a Connected Continent. Den skiten kommer att träffa fläkten hårt i alla medlemsländer, antar jag? Det är en draft nu, men det slutliga beslutet väntas komma om cirka 10 dagar. Förutom att det är en massa spektrum och mobiltelefonifrågor vad jag kan så innehåller det ett hårresande förslag om e-post: It is important that end-users experience continuity when changing important identifiers such as email addresses. To this end, and to ensure that email communications are not lost, end-users should be provided with a possibility to opt for an email forwarding facility offered by the transferring Internet access service provider in cases where the end-user has an email address provided by the transferring provider. Alltså, har det brunnit på övervåningen? Har de inte upptäckt att man kan ha flera e-postadresser, eller egen domän med separat e-posttjänst, Gmail eller någon av de andra gratistjänsterna för e-post? Vet de om att det är kontraproduktivt eftersom det förstör för dem som använder SPF? Även om jag inte är någon varm förespråkare av SPF så används det trots allt. /amel Anne-Marie Eklund Löwinder Säkerhetschef, .SE (Stiftelsen för Internetinfrastruktur) Box 7399 SE-103 91 Stockholm Besökare: Ringvägen 100 Direkt: 08-452 35 17 | Mobil: 0734-315 310 http://www.iis.se/en/ Twitter: @amelsec

1 0

Tvingande regel att vidarebefordra e-post
by Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder 04 Sep '13

04 Sep '13

http://www.edri.org/files/130709-SM-ISC.pdf artikel 24, sidan 42. REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL laying down measures to complete the European single market for electronic communications and to achieve a Connected Continent. Den skiten kommer att träffa fläkten hårt i alla medlemsländer, antar jag? Det är en draft nu, men det slutliga beslutet väntas komma om cirka 10 dagar. Förutom att det är en massa spektrum och mobiltelefonifrågor vad jag kan så innehåller det ett hårresande förslag om e-post: It is important that end-users experience continuity when changing important identifiers such as email addresses. To this end, and to ensure that email communications are not lost, end-users should be provided with a possibility to opt for an email forwarding facility offered by the transferring Internet access service provider in cases where the end-user has an email address provided by the transferring provider. Alltså, har det brunnit på övervåningen? Har de inte upptäckt att man kan ha flera e-postadresser, eller egen domän med separat e-posttjänst, Gmail eller någon av de andra gratistjänsterna för e-post? Vet de om att det är kontraproduktivt eftersom det förstör för dem som använder SPF? Även om jag inte är någon varm förespråkare av SPF så används det trots allt. /amel Anne-Marie Eklund Löwinder Säkerhetschef, .SE (Stiftelsen för Internetinfrastruktur) Box 7399 SE-103 91 Stockholm Besökare: Ringvägen 100 Direkt: 08-452 35 17 | Mobil: 0734-315 310 http://www.iis.se/en/ Twitter: @amelsec

2 1

EU:s blockering av Tor-användare
by Linus Nordberg 04 Sep '13

04 Sep '13

Hej listan! Den här tråden på LiberationTech är intressant: https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/liberationtech/2013-September/011263… Flera av EU:s websidor blockerar Tor. Jag har ett öppet ärende angående detta sedan en tid tillbaka (https://www.dfri.se/wiki/access-europa-eu-complaint/). För info så har jag också pratat med Michael Niebel på EU-kommissionen angående detta. Vi får se om det ger något.

1 0

sms+mail -> txt+mail
by Erik Josefsson 03 Sep '13

03 Sep '13

Jag har två appar i min telefon som jag användermed känslan av att den ena är lite mer privat (sms). Fastän det kostar och är ganska dyrt har jag alltså skickat tusentals sms fastän jag lika gärna skulle kunnat maila.Jag tror inte att jag är ensam om detta. Jag skulle kanske kunna klara att sluta smsa och bara mejla, men kom just på att det kanske inte är så dumt att ha ett irrationellt beteende om man skullebyta ut sms-tjänsten mot den nya tjänsten TXT. Den finns inte än, men skulle kunna uppfinnas. Alltså en tjänst som man använder när man vill vara helt privat. Alltså en tjänst som beter sig på det sättet man tror sms funkar. Kanske med ett helt nytt protokoll? Grejjen är den attäven om jag börjar kryptera mina mail (försöker igen och igen...), så tror jag att mitt invanda mail-beteendeförr eller senare kommer att klanta till det för mig. När man vill varaprivat går man ju undan, viskar eller gör nåt annat distinkt så att man själv vet att man är privat.Visst skulle det hjälpa om hela min mailklient blev blinkande röd om jag skulle göra bort mig, menrent teoretiskt så borde risken för misstag vara mindre om man helt enkelt "gör" på nåt annat sätt när man ska prata avskilt och enskilt med folk. Men TXTkanske redan finns? //Erik

3 2

Debattartikel i DN om reglerna kring nedtagning av websidor
by Linus Nordberg 03 Sep '13

03 Sep '13

Hej! Dagens DN Debatt har den här texten, undertecknad av bl.a. DFRI: http://www.dn.se/debatt/godtyckligt-regelverk-hotar-friheten-pa-natet/ Kommer EU-kommissionär Cecilia Malmström att se till att framtida regler för stängning av websidor kommer att tas fram i en öppen och demokratisk process?

1 0

Fwd: ADBJ Seminarium 5/9 - Påminnelse
by Robert Malmgren 02 Sep '13

02 Sep '13

det här kan nog vara av intresse för flera här -------- Original Message -------- *Påminnelse!* ___________________________________________________________________ ADBJ -- Svenska Föreningen för IT och Juridik inbjuder till seminarium *När*: Torsdagen den 5 september 2013, kl. 17.30 *Plats*: Advokatfirman Fylgia, Nybrogatan 11, Stockholm *Anmälan senast*: 3 september, till e-postadressen: kansliet(a)adbj.se <mailto:kansliet@adbj.se> *Ämne*: Förslagen från utredningen om IT-brottskonventionen I utredningens betänkande ingår förslag till lagändringar för att Sverige ska kunna tillträda och uppfylla Europarådets konvention om IT-brottslighet med tilläggsprotokoll och även direktivet om angrepp mot informationssystem m.m. Förslagen innebär bl.a. skärpta straff för dataintrång men även vissa nya tvångsmedel för att säkerställa information i brottsutredningarna. Enligt förslagen ska den som innehar elektroniska uppgifter av betydelse för en brottsutredning kunna föreläggas att spara dem under tystnadsplikt ("bevarandeföreläggande"). Den som har kunskap om ett IT-system och dess funktioner ska också kunna föreläggas att vara behjälplig i en brottsutredning. Av betänkandet (SOU 2013:39) framgår att svensk rätt behöver modifieras för att uppfylla konventionskravet avseende vad som ska utgöra urkundsförfalskning. Detta kan enligt utredningen ske genom att regeringens förslag till nytt urkundsbegrepp i 14 kap. 1 § brottsbalken antas av riksdagen. Sekreteraren för utredningen, Anna Graninger, kommer att berätta om utredningens slutsatser. Utredningens expert, advokaten Per Furberg, Setterwalls Advokatbyrå, kommenterar också förslagen. __________________ Vi inleder kl. 17.30 med en enklare förtäring och seminariet håller på mellan ca 18.00--19.15. Deltagarantalet är begränsat -- först till kvarn gäller! Seminariet är gratis för medlemmar. Icke medlemmar betalar en anmälningsavgift om 250 kronor. *OBS!*Anmälan är bindande! Någon bekräftelse av Din anmälan kommer inte att skickas ut. Vid förhinder ska avanmälan ske senast kl. 12.00 dagen före seminariet. Deltar Du inte trots att Du är anmäld kommer vi att debitera dig 250 kronor.

3 2

EurActiv - Professor Svallfors: "Edward Snowden deserves the Sakharov Prize"
by Erik Josefsson 30 Aug '13

30 Aug '13

http://www.euractiv.com/pa/edward-snowden-deserves-sakharov-analysis-530027 Edward Snowden deserves the Sakharov Prize A deserving recipient of the 2013 Sakharov prize would be the American whistleblower Edward Snowden, writes Stefan Svallfors. By exposing the US Prism spying program, Snowden made it possible for us to say 'No -- this is not a development and a society we want', he argues. /Stefan Svallfors is Professor of Sociology at Umeå University (Sweden) and the Institute for Future Studies (Denmark). This op-ed was originally published in Swedish in Sydsvenska dagbladet on 29 August 2013. / Since 1988, the European Parliament has awarded the Sakharov Prize. According to its statutes, this is given to a person or group "who made remarkable efforts to defend human rights and fundamental freedoms" and thus "worked against intolerance, fanaticism and oppression." The award is given in memory of the Russian physicist Andrei Sakharov (1921-1989), known as one of the men behind the hydrogen bomb but even more as a Soviet dissident with his Human Rights Committee and his defence of political prisoners. Sakharov stands as a symbol of the individual human being who dares to stand up against tyranny and oppression, even when the personal cost is very high. A most deserving recipient of the 2013 price would be the American whistle blower Edward Snowden. In May, The Guardian published his disclosure of the extensive, illegal and deeply intrusive monitoring conducted by the American National Security Agency. For this heroic effort Snowden has paid a heavy personal price. He is hunted as an outlaw by the U.S. government, accused of crimes that will put him in jail for the rest of his life. The U.S. government has threatened the governments that dare to offer him asylum with serious consequences. In a painful irony, the only sanctuary that had been found for Snowden is Russia, a country whose democratic problems and authoritarian tendencies are obvious. But is really Snowden a worthy recipient of the prize, someone may sneeze. Is not America the world's leading democracy, a friend of Europe, committed to the rule of law? Yes. But even democracies can hide pockets of tyranny in their hearts: a democratic state may well coexist with other systems that are characterised by anything but democracy and law. As the monitoring system which now puts its global tentacles far into the private lives of citizens. By exposing this system Snowden made it possible for us to say No -- this is not a development and a society we want, we protect our civil rights and freedoms when they are threatened. Snowden's revelations make explicit demands on citizens and politicians to act and react. How have we responded to these demands? Not in any impressive way one must say. Individual politicians and many citizens have reacted, expressed support for Snowden, trying to act in his defence. They see the unpleasant consequences of a surveillance system where innocent citizens get their electronic communication and their phone calls tapped and mapped. The German President Joachim Gauck, with his personal East German experience, for example stated that Snowden "deserves respect" for his actions. But otherwise an awkward silence, evasive answers, gentle tiptoeing. Merkel hums, The European Commission whispers, the parliaments remain silent. On the Swedish side, even more depressing inaction is observed. Sweden acts together with Britain to make sure the question should not be addressed at European level. This is a bilateral issue and by the way, no Swedish interests are at stake, the Foreign Minister distractedly announces before returning to Twitter. The government obviously sees no reason to allow this issue to eclipse the splendor of Obama's forthcoming state visit. From the political left, a complete disinterest is shown. No social democratic position is advanced or even formulated. It is tragic to see how thin the liberal veneer is in many places. When liberalism is no longer easy and obvious, when it requires courage and sacrifice, when we are forced to choose and our choices have real costs, what happens then? We fall into line, we bend to power. Without grumbling we let fairly manageable threats from terrorists sweep away fundamental rights and freedoms. We must demand more of ourselves and our elected officials than that. We could start by giving Edward Snowden the prize whose name symbolises a man who refused to bow to oppression and thereby actually changed history.

1 0

Re: Fwd: [DFRI-listan] Stefan Svallfors: "Låt Snowden få Sacharovpriset"
by "Christian Engström (pp)" 29 Aug '13

29 Aug '13

Sara, Utmärkt idé att nominera Snowden till Sacharovpriset. Tar du reda på hur vi gör? /Christian On 2013-08-29 14:25, Erik Lönroth wrote: > Kanske något för er? > > Sista datum är den 12:e september. > > /Erik Lönroth > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Erik Josefsson* <erik.hjalmar.josefsson(a)gmail.com > <mailto:erik.hjalmar.josefsson@gmail.com>> > Date: Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:35 AM > Subject: [DFRI-listan] Stefan Svallfors: "Låt Snowden få Sacharovpriset" > To: "listan(a)lists.dfri.se <mailto:listan@lists.dfri.se>" > <listan(a)lists.dfri.se <mailto:listan@lists.dfri.se>> > > > Sydsvenskan publicerar idag 29 augusti en artikel av Professor Stefan > Svallfors: > > *"Låt Snowden få Sacharovpriset"* > http://www.sydsvenskan.se/opinion/aktuella-fragor/lat-snowden-fa-sacharovpr… > > Nedan en engelsk version. > > //Erik > > *A Sakharov for our time? > * > Since 1988, the European Parliament has awarded the Sakharov Prize. According to its statutes, this is given to a person or group "who made remarkable efforts to defend human rights and fundamental freedoms" and thus "worked against intolerance, fanaticism and oppression." > > The award is given in memory of the Russian physicist Andrei Sakharov (1921-1989), known as one of the men behind the hydrogen bomb but even more as a Soviet dissident with his Human Rights Committee and his defense of political prisoners. Sakharov stands as a symbol of the individual human being who dares to stand up against tyranny and oppression, even when the personal cost is very high. > > A most deserving recipient of the 2013 price would be the American whistle blower Edward Snowden. In May, The Guardian published his disclosure of the extensive, illegal and deeply intrusive monitoring conducted by the American National Security Agency. For this heroic effort Snowden has paid a heavy personal price. He is hunted as an outlaw by the U.S. government, accused of crimes that will put him in jail for the rest of his life. The U.S. government has threatened the governments that dare to offer him asylum with serious consequences. In a painful irony, the only sanctuary that had been found for Snowden is Russia, a country whose democratic problems and authoritarian tendencies are obvious. > > But is really Snowden a worthy recipient of the prize, someone may sneeze. Is not America the world's leading democracy, a friend of Europe, committed to the rule of law? Yes. But even democracies can hide pockets of tyranny in their hearts, a democratic state may well coexist with other systems that are characterized by anything but democracy and law. As the monitoring system which now puts its global tentacles far into the private lives of citizens. By exposing this system Snowden made it possible for us to say No – this is not a development and a society we want, we protect our civil rights and freedoms when they are threatened. > > Snowden's revelations make explicit demands on citizens and politicians to act and react. How have we responded to these demands? Not in any impressive way one must say. Individual politicians and many citizens have reacted, expressed support for Snowden, trying to act in his defense. They see the unpleasant consequences of a surveillance system where innocent citizens get their electronic communication and their phone calls tapped and mapped. The German President Joachim Gauck, with his personal East German experience, for example stated that Snowden "deserves respect" for his actions. But otherwise an awkward silence, evasive answers, gentle tiptoeing. Merkel hums, The European Commission whispers, the parliaments remain silent. > > On the Swedish side, even more depressing inaction is observed. Sweden acts together with Britain to make sure the question should not be addressed at European level. This is a bilateral issue and by the way, no Swedish interests are at stake, the Foreign Minister distractedly announces before returning to Twitter. The government obviously sees no reason to allow this issue to eclipse the splendor of Obama's forthcoming state visit. From the political left, a complete disinterest is shown. No social democratic position is advanced or even formulated. > > It is tragic to see how thin the liberal veneer is in many places. When liberalism is no longer easy and obvious, when it requires courage and sacrifice, when we are forced to choose and our choices have real costs, what happens then? We fall into line, we bend to power. Without grumbling we let fairly manageable threats from terrorists sweep away fundamental rights and freedoms. > > We must demand more of ourselves and our elected officials than that. We could start by giving Edward Snowden the price whose name symbolizes a man who refused to bow to oppression and thereby actually changed history. > > > > Stefan Svallfors > Professor of Sociology at Umeå University > & the Institute for Future Studies > -- Christian Engström Member of the European Parliament Piratpartiet - The Pirate Party +46-70-663 37 80 http://christianengstrom.wordpress.com/ christian.engstrom(a)piratpartiet.se <mailto:christian.engstrom@piratpartiet.se> Pictures: http://picasaweb.google.com/christian.engstrom.pirat/ChristianEngstrom#

2 1

Stefan Svallfors: "Låt Snowden få Sacharovpriset"
by Erik Josefsson 29 Aug '13

29 Aug '13

Sydsvenskan publicerar idag 29 augusti en artikel av Professor Stefan Svallfors: *"Låt Snowden få Sacharovpriset"* http://www.sydsvenskan.se/opinion/aktuella-fragor/lat-snowden-fa-sacharovpr… Nedan en engelsk version. //Erik *A Sakharov for our time? * Since 1988, the European Parliament has awarded the Sakharov Prize. According to its statutes, this is given to a person or group "who made remarkable efforts to defend human rights and fundamental freedoms" and thus "worked against intolerance, fanaticism and oppression." The award is given in memory of the Russian physicist Andrei Sakharov (1921-1989), known as one of the men behind the hydrogen bomb but even more as a Soviet dissident with his Human Rights Committee and his defense of political prisoners. Sakharov stands as a symbol of the individual human being who dares to stand up against tyranny and oppression, even when the personal cost is very high. A most deserving recipient of the 2013 price would be the American whistle blower Edward Snowden. In May, The Guardian published his disclosure of the extensive, illegal and deeply intrusive monitoring conducted by the American National Security Agency. For this heroic effort Snowden has paid a heavy personal price. He is hunted as an outlaw by the U.S. government, accused of crimes that will put him in jail for the rest of his life. The U.S. government has threatened the governments that dare to offer him asylum with serious consequences. In a painful irony, the only sanctuary that had been found for Snowden is Russia, a country whose democratic problems and authoritarian tendencies are obvious. But is really Snowden a worthy recipient of the prize, someone may sneeze. Is not America the world's leading democracy, a friend of Europe, committed to the rule of law? Yes. But even democracies can hide pockets of tyranny in their hearts, a democratic state may well coexist with other systems that are characterized by anything but democracy and law. As the monitoring system which now puts its global tentacles far into the private lives of citizens. By exposing this system Snowden made it possible for us to say No -- this is not a development and a society we want, we protect our civil rights and freedoms when they are threatened. Snowden's revelations make explicit demands on citizens and politicians to act and react. How have we responded to these demands? Not in any impressive way one must say. Individual politicians and many citizens have reacted, expressed support for Snowden, trying to act in his defense. They see the unpleasant consequences of a surveillance system where innocent citizens get their electronic communication and their phone calls tapped and mapped. The German President Joachim Gauck, with his personal East German experience, for example stated that Snowden "deserves respect" for his actions. But otherwise an awkward silence, evasive answers, gentle tiptoeing. Merkel hums, The European Commission whispers, the parliaments remain silent. On the Swedish side, even more depressing inaction is observed. Sweden acts together with Britain to make sure the question should not be addressed at European level. This is a bilateral issue and by the way, no Swedish interests are at stake, the Foreign Minister distractedly announces before returning to Twitter. The government obviously sees no reason to allow this issue to eclipse the splendor of Obama's forthcoming state visit. From the political left, a complete disinterest is shown. No social democratic position is advanced or even formulated. It is tragic to see how thin the liberal veneer is in many places. When liberalism is no longer easy and obvious, when it requires courage and sacrifice, when we are forced to choose and our choices have real costs, what happens then? We fall into line, we bend to power. Without grumbling we let fairly manageable threats from terrorists sweep away fundamental rights and freedoms. We must demand more of ourselves and our elected officials than that. We could start by giving Edward Snowden the price whose name symbolizes a man who refused to bow to oppression and thereby actually changed history. Stefan Svallfors Professor of Sociology at Umeå University & the Institute for Future Studies

4 5

← Newer
1
...
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
...
81
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

Listan